ABSTRACT
Purpose: Preliminary studies suggest that kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) show diminished humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Although reports of allograft rejection after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been rare, there is no recommended framework for monitoring for potential vaccine-related allograft injury. Here, we describe an approach for longitudinal assessment of immunogenicity and safety of SARS-COV-2 vaccination in KTRs. Method(s): KTRs eligible for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were identified through medical records, beginning March 12, 2021. Baseline and weekly blood samples were collected for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody titers, dd-cfDNA and gene expression profiling (GEP) for 12 weeks. Donor specific antibody (DSA) testing was performed at baseline, 2 weeks after completion of vaccine doses and at week 12. Antibody response was defined as a 10-fold increase in total binding IgG titers. Result(s): 49 KTRs were identified for analysis. Patient demographics are shown in Table 1. Ten patients (20.4%) demonstrated a spike antibody response post- vaccination. Of responders, 80% (n=8) had a history of COVID-19. The odds ratio for the association of a history of COVID-19 with vaccine response was 18.3 (95% CI 3.2, 105.0, p=0.0005). Median dd-cfDNA levels did not differ between pre- and postvaccination (0.23% versus 0.21% respectively). There was no significant difference between pre- and post-vaccination GEP scores (9.85 versus 10.4 respectively). No patients developed clinically significant DSA, eGFR decline or allograft rejection following vaccination. Conclusion(s): Quantitative antibody responses were strongly associated with a diagnosis of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Stability of eGFR, dd-cfDNA, GEP profiles and lack of allosensitization reinforce the safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in KTRs. Further studies are needed to better understand immunogenicity in SARSCoV- 2 naive individuals, including whether cellular responses are protective in the absence of humoral responses.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Correlates of protection for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are not well-established in kidney transplant recipients(KTRs). Studies have highlighted the importance of neutralizing antibodies(Abs), however data suggests T cell responses may play a secondary role in preventing reinfection. We performed a longitudinal assessment of immunogenicity, T and B cell response in KTRs following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Method(s): KTRs eligible for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination from 3/12/21 were enrolled. Baseline and weekly blood samples were collected for routine lab, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein Ab titers and cellular phenotyping for 12 weeks. Ab response was defined as a 10-fold increase in total binding IgG titers. To determine if T cell responses were induced by vaccination, we considered the proportion of activated non-naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells post-vaccination. Result(s): 49 KTRs were enrolled ( Demographics -Table 1). 10 patients (20.4%) mounted an Ab response following vaccination. A history of COVID-19 was associated with an increased likelihood of developing an Ab response (OR: 18.3, 95% CI 3.2, 105.0, p=0.0005). For non-naive CD8+ T cells, a subset co-expressing CD38+Ki67+ was induced 1 week after the 1st immunization in some SARS-CoV- 2-naiive patients (P=0.12 versus P=0.14 for SARS-CoV-2-experienced adults, Fig 1A/B). For non-naive CD4+ T cells, induction of a subset co-expressing CD38+Ki67+ was observed at 1 week after the 1st immunization for SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (P = 0.09 for SARS-CoV-2-naive, P=0.03 for SARS-CoV-2-experienced adults, Fig 1C/D). For CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, dose 2 stimulated weak induction of the CD38+Ki67+ subset in the SARS-CoV-2-naive patients only (Fig 1A-D). Conclusion(s): Quantitative Ab responses were strongly associated with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were evident in most patients irrespective of history of COVID-19. Further studies are needed to determine whether these activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were antigenspecific or confer immunity. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
SRTR data currently suggests that induction therapy in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) with rabbit antithymoglobulin (ATG) provides survival advantage compared to interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA). We are reporting the outcomes of recipients with SHKT treated with IL2-RA as induction therapy. This is a single center, retrospective study of 26 patients who received SHKT at our institution from Dec 2018 to Oct 2021. A multidisciplinary team composed of heart and kidney transplant medical and surgical members determined appropriate recipient-donor SHKT candidate pairs. The majority of patients received IL2-RA induction therapy, and all patients received triple immunosuppression therapy with prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. Adjustments in long term therapy were made in collaboration between the heart and kidney transplant teams. From Dec 2018 to Oct 2021, 26 patients underwent SHKT. 23 patients (88%) were male, the median age was 57 years, and 5.4% were ≥ 65 years. 18 patients (69%) had non ischemic cardiomyopathy and 24 patients (92%) had CKD (mean GFR ≤ 35%). 18 patients were listed Status 2 and 2 patient Status 5. One patient received a DCD donor and 12 patients (46%) received hep C donors. 25 patients (96%) received induction therapy with IL2-RA. During the first 3 months post-transplant, the only patient who received ATG had 7 severe infections;11 patients (44%) and 13 patients (52%) who received IL2 -RA had no infections and ≤ 4 mild infections, respectively. One patient died due to COVID 19 pneumonia complicated by multisystem organ failure. For a median follow up period of 410 (187-707) days, 8% patients in the IL2-RA induction cohort experienced a 2R/3A heart rejection, 8% patients remained on HD due to primary kidney graft non-function, and the survival rate was 96%. Compared with present literature, our data support the use of IL2- RA as an induction strategy in SHKT with excellent patient survival. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Purpose: As an early epicenter in the coronavirus pandemic, our center modified induction immunosuppression strategies for transplantation. We sought to determine if changes in induction immunosuppression secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the incidence of acute rejection. Methods: Adult kidney transplant recipients at NYU Langone Health between 09/2019 and 08/2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received a multiorgan transplant or whose induction regimen was changed due to clinical course were excluded. Patients transplanted before and after 3/17/2020 were grouped as pre-pandemic (PRE) and post-pandemic (POST), respectively, based on temporary interruption of transplantation. Induction immunosuppression discordance was identified by blind adjudication from a standard protocol. Reduced induction agent use (basiliximab given when pre-pandemic protocol indicated rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG)) was compared between groups using a Chi-square test. Biopsyproven acute rejection (BPAR) and the incidence of rejection was compared using a Poisson regression model. Results: 203 kidney transplant recipients were retrospectively identified. 38 patients were excluded, leaving 165 patients for analysis. Median patient age was 57 years, 67% were male, and diabetes mellitus (35%) was the most common cause of renal disease. Discordance from protocol induction agent was 16% in the PRE group and 28% in the POST group (p=0.06). More patients received reduced induction with basiliximab in lieu of rATG in the POST group than the PRE group (26% vs. 7%, p=0.001). BPAR occurred in 5 PRE (5%) and 6 POST (11%) patients (p=0.19). The incidence of rejection was 0.13 and 0.75 rejection episodes/1,000-patient days for the PRE and POST groups, respectively;this was significantly different between the 2 time periods (unadjusted IRR 5.69, 95% CI 1.74-18.6, p=0.004). Conclusions: More patients received reduced induction immunosuppression driven by the COVID-19 pandemic concerns. These COVID-related changes in immunosuppression may have contributed to a trend in increased acute rejection in a preliminary analysis.